12.03. The only people who would know the Brand were in the pitch are a)the client and b) the Brand. What are the odds you are 1) not the client? and 2)not 12.15 and 12.39?
1203. You are completely over thinking this. Based on what I have heard there were several companies involved. I don’t see the relevance of your comment.
I was merely asking why you thought it was going to 303 ‘regardless’. Also based on your odds theory I would not be going to the casino tonight.
11.40 you don’t award agency of the year to an agency who hasn’t laid off any staff and haven’t done any decent creative work. If it goes small it will go Rares way
GET THE CB DAILY BULLETIN
Register for Free and receive the Campaign Brief Daily Bulletin. Type your email address in the space below.
12 Comments
Nice work guys
Nice work.
Any chance of rehiring those recently ditched?
That throws a cat among the CB Agency of the Year pigeons
Who were the other contenders?
It’s already been judged. And really, do you think this would make any difference? Or are you taking the piss?
9.09
Meekats vs Rare
5.15 – you’re dreaming!
9.09 – The Brand were in the pitch.
From what I hear there were no other real contenders, it was always going to go to 303 regardless.
12.15. What’s with the 303 regardless thing?
12.03. The only people who would know the Brand were in the pitch are a)the client and b) the Brand. What are the odds you are 1) not the client? and 2)not 12.15 and 12.39?
1203. You are completely over thinking this. Based on what I have heard there were several companies involved. I don’t see the relevance of your comment.
I was merely asking why you thought it was going to 303 ‘regardless’. Also based on your odds theory I would not be going to the casino tonight.
11.40 you don’t award agency of the year to an agency who hasn’t laid off any staff and haven’t done any decent creative work. If it goes small it will go Rares way