Crews that subcontract to the production companies are the real victims in the lack of transparency in advertising production

| | 5 Comments

Big-fish-little-fish.jpg

The sad fact is that the people that end up ultimately suffering in the lack of transparency in advertising production are the smallest, such as the crews that subcontract to the production companies, says Darren Woolley, founder of TrinityP3

Last year the ANA [in the US] responded to the investigation by the Department of Justice into Agency production practices and included this in their call for greater transparency in advertiser and agency relationships.

The concern was that agencies and especially the Holding Companies that own the agency groups, were competitively tendering for advertiser commercial productions against the independent production companies in an unfair and biased manner.

DWoolley_2008.jpg

Effectively it was claimed that the agencies were lining their own coffers by under cutting the independent production companies by having them tender and then providing competitive services at a lower price, effectively and unfairly squeezing them in the market.

But from our perspective of more than 30 years of industry experience, this lack of transparency exists at every level of the production process in some form and in fact all parties, from the advertiser whales down to the smallest minnows could be more transparent in the process.

The sad fact is that the people that end up ultimately suffering in this process are the smallest such as the crews that subcontract to the production companies.